About Me

Name: JTD
Email: THEMAELSTROMBLOG@AOL.COM
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

PLEASE, LET'S DEFINE THE BRADLEY EFFECT CORRECTLY

In his November 1st Town Hall column, "The Spiral of Silence", Wynton Hall improperly defines the Bradley Effect. 
(
http://townhall.com/columnists/WyntonHall/2008/10/31/obamas_spiral_of_silence)
Since we are going to hear endless prattling from the media about the BE after Obama's vote count falls drastically short of his poll numbers and McCain sweeps to victory, it is important that we get this definition correct.
 
Named after  democrat Los Angeles Mayor Thomas Bradley who lost his race for California governor in 1982 (and again in 1986) after leading comfortably in the polls prior to the election, the BE was the result of people's fear of being characterized as "racist" if they indicated to a pollster that they were intending to vote for Bradley's opponent.    Bradley, the minority candidate's, poll numbers were inflated because of the sheer number of undecided or Republican voters who told pollsters they were voting for Bradley rather than risk being judge a racist.
 
Hall erroneously indicates in his column that the Bradley Effect is the result of actual, latent racism.    Again, since the fevered minds of the radical left are going to be screaming "racism" endlessly and vociferously after Obama loses, we simply cannot afford to let the dems define the Bradley Effect.
 
I predict that the BE in 2008 is going to be far greater than it was in 1982.   Today's political climate has been racially hypercharged
by the supposedly post-racial candidate, Obama.  Let's not forget that the left has never been faster on the draw when it comes to pulling the racisim trigger than they are today.   Recall that Hillary's tears after one of the democrat primaries, were called racist by the Obama camp.   Most recently,  a liberal loon opined in his column that the word "socialism"  was a code word for "Black."  Therefore, to call BHO economic policies socialist was racism, pure and simple. 
 
In a campaign where anything and everything can be deemed a "code word" for some other nefarious epithet that must never be uttered in public or private,  the fear of being unfairly deemed a racist is greater than ever.  Undecided in your vote?  Just tell the pollster you're voting Obama, get the clown off the phone and get back to dinner.    Leaning toward McCain?  Uhoh, do you really want to tell that to this cipher with the clipboard.   Just say, "I like Obama" and get on with your shopping.   Can't be too careful, nowadays. 
 
So Obama leads in the polls.  Big deal.  We are going to find out that McCain is ahead in the hearts and minds of the electorate. 
 
Sorry, Barry, old buddy, old pal.......It's not your year.  By the way, 2012 is not going to be your year either, my duplicitous friend.  By then -- even if you haven't been indicted in the Rezko affair -- all of your carefully hidden little secrets will be public domain, and your carefully crafted simulacrum of substance will be the stuff of farce.  You will be nothing more than a bizarre historical footnote!  How Sweet It Is!  
 
THE MAELSTROM QUOTE OF THE DAY:
 
Success usually comes to those who are too busy to spend their time looking for it.
 
Henry David Thoreau 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BARACK THE BARBARIAN

Of course Barack is a radical on most issues.  But on one particular issue he is more than radical, he is a barbarian.  That issue is abortion.
 
Why?   Because of his support for partial birth abortion, and even worse, his belief that a baby that survives an abortion attempt must be deprived of medical care and left to die in ignominious solitude.   PBA is bad enough.   How can any person or society that claims a modicum of civilization countenance a procedure that pierces the skull of a perfectly formed, healthy, beautiful and viable infant
and sucks out its brains?
 
How can anyone -- especially that sophisticated, urbane, Haaaaaaavard trained, metrosexual named barack -- be so radically devoted to the concept of abortion that he would deny medical care to an infant that survives a botched abortion?   This is savagery, pure and simple; and anyone that supports it, is himself a barbarian of the first order. 
 
Before proceeding any further, let me define myself.  I am agnostic, so I bring no religious argument to this debate.  I am very conservative, usually vote Republican, but am decidedly moderate on the issue of abortion.  I believe that it would be imprudent to outlaw abortion, but that it is necessary to strictly control it.   I believe, for example, that no minor should have an abortion without the consent of her parents.  I believe that partial birth abortion is both inhuman and inhumane.  I believe that a fetus upon attaining viability is confered with its own Human rights.
 
Conceptually, abortion is nasty and ugly.....particularly nasty and ugly when routinely utilized as a woman's primary birth control device. And let's not pull any punches here, the farther along in development the fetus is, the nastier and uglier the procedure gets.   Even if necessary to protect the life of the mother,  it is ghastly business.
 
I do not, however,  believe that Human life exists at the moment of conception.   Is it life?  Yes, of course it is!   Is it Human.  Well, It is certainly of Human origin!     But, perhaps there's a better question to ask:  Is the fetus at the point of conception a Human Being?  No, it is not.  And it is not, for the same reason that we allow doctors or family to "pull the plug" when a patient is brain dead:  The absence of discernible, coherent brain activity.
 
Like the brain dead patient, the fetus is a living organism, but it is not what we recongnize as a Human Being.   It is on the way to becoming a Human Being, God willing, but it is not yet there.
 
Ignoring -- only for sake of this argument -- the lack of a constitutional basis for Roe v. Wade, the original trimester formula for discerning the presence of life has a logical basis, although it must be acknowledged that subsequent court cases have essentially gutted Roe's trimester formulation.   Nonetheless there is a strong rational behind the formula:  In the first three months, the fetus is nascient life only, and the mother's rights must prevail.  In the last three months, the fetus is -- especially given modern medical capacities -- capable of life outside the mother's womb and MUST be accorded its own rights vis-avis the mother.
 
And that leaves the middle trimester. Ay, there's the rub!    Who's rights prevail here?  The mother or the  fetus?  Obviously this is the most difficult of grey areas,  especially in light of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's observation that the trimester formula was on a collision course with itself, as advances in obstetric medicine inevitably pushed the point of viability ever closer to the moment of conception.
 
But for our purposes here,  we need not address the issue of viability.  Can any rational person doubt that a full term, viable infant is a Human Being, even if its head -- and only its head -- is still inside the mother's birth canal?   Of course not, only a hopeless ideologue could so argue.  Only an individual who has cast aside his own humanity could so argue.  Only a barbarian!
 
That's bad enough, but consider the cruelty and savagery of the man who says we must not give medical care to a surviving infant, because to do so might hinder the cause of abortion itself.  Where is that man's compassion?  Where is his humanity?  There is none, for that man is a barbarian.
 
And this brings us to the essence of Barack Hussein Obama.......a man so blindly devoted to his radical ideologies that he is willing, when necessary, to check his humanity at the door and to wreck unspeakable cruelty upon the innocent.
 
Beyond the well tailored suits, beyond the florid rhetoric, beyond the winning smile there lies a monster, a savage.......a barbarian!
 
                                                                                                                                                               The Maelstrom
 
THE MAELSTROM QUOTE OF THE DAY:
 
The politician who is willing to tax Peter to pay Paul, can always count on the vote of Paul.
 
                                                                                                         H.L. Mencken
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

SECRET BALLOT IS A WINNING ISSUE FOR MCCAIN

Elections often turn on small issues, especially when the pivotal issue is simple, easy to explain and cuts to the heart of core American beliefs.   Obama's assault on the secret ballot is a slam dunk winning issue.  Lord knows, McCain needs a pivotal issue right now.  Why isn't he using the card check bill to bludgeon Obama into submission.

It is time for all of us to force this issue into the spotlight.

The secret ballot is a revered part of our heritage.  Everyone understands it, everyone instinctively and intuitively believes that it is sacrosanct.    Yet Obama, proving his credentials as a Big Labor shill,  backs the card check bill that the unions desparately crave.

The bill -- shamelessly and cynically titled the "Employee Free Choice Act" -- deprives employees of the right to a secret ballot in elections to determine if they will be represented by a union.  Apparently, Obama's idea of "free choice" is to allow employees to be browbeaten by union thugs and goons.

Obama strongly supports this bill, but he doesn't want Americans -- other than Big Labor -- to know that.  So this powerful and potentially pivotal issue has been ignored by the relentlessly pro-Obama media and, consequently, is unknown to the vast majority of the American electorate.   It is time to trumpet this issue.

Fundamentally, this issue is a "two-fer."   Not only does it place Obama squarely against a right that the American public holds dear, it definitely proves his slavish devotion to Big Labor.   It undeniably shows that he would deny Americans a fundamental right rather than stand up to any of the democrat special interest groups.

The charge must be levied loudly and vehemently, "Obama is opposed to the secret ballot."   How can he possible repond?  How can he possibly defend his position?   Will he say, "No, I am only opposed to the secret ballot in union elections."   No one is going to buy that argument.  To the average American it's simple, "Keep your damn hands off the secret ballot.   Union election or not, leave the secret ballot alone!"

This is a fire storm issue.  One that people "get" at the gut level.   Any fair minded person will intuitively and immediately recognize the kind of union thuggery implicit in the bill. 

This issue is a poweful Obamacide.  Time to spray the roaches.

THE MAELSTROM QUOTE OF THE DAY:

"If you don't know context, you don't know anything."  
                                 Dennis Prager.  Talk radio host, author and lecturer.

The Maelstrom



 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

NEWS FLASH: NEW YORK TIMES ENDORSES SARAH PALIN

 
Can you believe it?   I quote directly from the New York Times:
 
"Where is it written that only senators are qualified to become President?.....Where is it written that governors and mayors. . . .are too local, too provincial?. . . Presidential candidates have always chosen their running mates for reasons of practical demography, not idealized democracy. . . .What a splendid system, we say to ourselves, that takes little-known men, tests them in high office and permits them to grow into statesmen...Why shouldn't a little-known woman have the same opportunity to grow?" 
 
Oh wait,  that's the New York Times endorsing Geraldine Ferraro on July 3, 1984.  Hmmmm, sound like the Old Gray Lady has been a tad hypocritical lately, don't it?
 
THE MAELSTROM QUOTE OF THE DAY:
 
"If one wishes to foretell the future of a society, one should visit its public school classrooms to see what is happening now.
William A. Henry III, "In Defense of Elitism" DoubleDay 1994
 
If that doesn't scare the hell out of you, then I don't know what will.
                                                                              The Maelstrom
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CALL THEM BACK INTO SESSION, NOW!

Pelosi, Reid and the democrats are on the wrong side of the drilling issue and it is time to hammer them into submission.
 
The President needs to call the Congress back into special session immediately.  Polls show that the country is strongly behind the Republican push to authorize wide spread drilling.  Unbelievably, 51%  of CALIFORNIA voters polled this last week favored offshore drilling.   Yes, you read that right.  51% of CALIFORNIA VOTERS.     This is clearly a watershed moment.   The President cannot allow this opportunity to get away.
 
Pelosi's heavy handed petulance in turning off the lights while Republicans were attempting to rally support for extending the session to allow for action on drilling has highlighted the obstructionist tactics of the dems on energy.
 
The President, with John McCain at his side, needs to announce the urgent need for action on energy and call for a special session.  The Republicans need to take to the airways and announce their unanimous support for a special session. 
 
The entire party especially must demand that Obama take a firm position on the special session.  Yes or No Barrack?  No in between.  No BO BS!  Yes or no, plain and simple. 
 
While the President can call a special session, he cannot force the congress to act.  But this is win-win for the President and the Republicans.   The media spotlight will be on the special session.  If Pelosi and Reid continue to keep this issue from getting to the floor in a special session, their craven beholding to their special interests will be front and center for the entire country to see.
 
With oil prices hovering at $120+ and the Republicans clamoring for action on energy, the dems are caught between the Scylla of obstructionism and the Charybdis of alienating their base.    Win-Win for us.  Lose-lose for them.
 
Here's is perhaps the most important reason for calling the Congress into special session:  Public relations insurance if the drilling dispute shuts down the government later this year.   The dems are going to refuse to bring budget appropriations to the floor, because to do so would allow Republicans the opportunity to offer amendments concerning drilling. 
 
They are willing to force a government shutdown with the intention of placing the blame on the Republicans.   They are fondly remembering the government shutdown that resulted from the Clinton-Gingrich budget impasse in the mid 90s.  Gingrich and his party took it on the chin for that one.
 
But that was then, this is now!   First, this time the public is on the side of the Republicans.    But most importantly, by calling a special session now, and perhaps even a second special session if Congress fails to act, Bush immunizes the Party from blame if a shut down does occur.   The President can point to his calls for a special session on energy as definitive proof that the Republicans tried mightily to avoid a shut down.
 
This is jugular time.  The dems are down.  It is time to stomp on them mercilessly.   If Obama can be tainted with Pelosi's intransegence on this issue, so much the better, he will never recover.   Sic 'em, Mr. President!
 
THE MALESTROM QUOTE OF THE DAY:  "If at first the idea is not absurd, there is no hope for it."  Albert Einsten
  
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE UGLINESS OF WINDFARMS AND SOLAR

Okay, let's see if I have this right.
 
ANWR is 19,000,000 acres of desolation, all of it situated above the Arctic Circle.  Only 60 days a year does it experience anything even close to full sunlight.  If ANWR were a state, it would be larger than ten other states in the Union.
 
It is proposed that the U.S. permit oil drilling on a small portion of that 19,000,000 acres, about 12,000 acres or roughly the size of Dulles Airport in Washington D.C.   But no, we cannot be allowed to defile this desolate, albeit pristine, wilderness.
 
Same with off shore drilling.  Drilling platforms on the outer shelf would not even be visible from the mainland....not even from the highest skyscrapers near the coast.
 
But the environmentalists want to put wind farms in every conceivable pass or plain which affords steady, reliable wind flows.  These wind farms consist of hundreds, even thousand of six to ten-story behemoths that are themselves a blot upon the landscape.    Make the drive from Los Angeles to Palm Springs some time, and you will be appalled at the silhouettes of hundreds of these whooshing monsters sprouting like gargantuan mushrooms along the horizon.
 
How man millions of these mechanical abominations do the enviros propose that we scatter across the countryside from coast to coast?   We already know that they are too ugly for Teddy "The Splash" Kennedy to abide in his watery play grounds off Hyannis Port or Martha's Vineyard.
 
And Solar?  Let's concede that roof top solar panels can be relatively unobtrusive and that technology will continue to make them even less and less so. 
 
But, what about the massive solar farms that are proposed by the greenies?   Working technologies include massive solar mirror arrays covering thousands of acres of  land.  One technology includes solar water towers hundreds of feet high onto which acres of parabolic mirrors focus rays of sunlight that produce steam to run electric generators.
 
I don't know about you, but the wonder and majesty of the Mojave and Sonoran deserts and even Death Valley are some of the things I have come to love most about living in Southern California.    I can't drill in ANWR. but it's okay for you to litter the desert with thousands of acres of new age Easy Bake Ovens.  I don't get it.
 
As for the danger of polluting the pristine ANWR or the oceans of the outer shelf, can we please get real?   Modern drilling technology is astonishingly enviro friendly.  Can we not admit the truth that drilling in Prudhoe Bay, Alaska has for 20 years been effectively pollution free.  None of the environmental perils envisioned by the green cassandras has occurred.  The Prudhoe pipeline has been an unqualified success with no environmental incidents of significance.
 
Of course, we must not forget the caribou.   We were told ceaselessly that drilling operations and the Prudhoe pipeline would pose a major threat to the precious caribou.    Since drilling began in Prudhoe, the caribou herds -- a randy bunch apparently -- have increased from 3,000 head to more that 38,000.  Some threat!
 
And let us not forget, that drilling technology has improved by quantum degrees since operations first began at Prudhoe, decades ago.  
 
We obsess endlessly on the devastaton of hurricane Katrina in New Orleans.   But, completely forgotten in the left's Katrina lamentations is that the hurricane blasted through the highest concentration of off shore drillling rigs in all of the United States without a single oil spill of consequence.
 
So let's cut the BS, please!   DRILL HERE!   DRILL THERE!    DRILL EVERYWHERE, DAMNIT!  AND DO IT NOW!
 
THE MAELSTROM QUOTE OF THE DAY:  "I have never learned to fight for my freedom.  I was only good at enjoying it."  Oscar van den Boogard, lamenting the demographic onslaught of Islam in his native Belgium.  (Special thanks to Mark Steyn www.Steynonline.com)
 
The Maelstrom
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

WHO PAYS A COMMUNITY ORGANIZER ANYWAY?

Mark Steyn (www.steynonline.com) has repeatedly asked on the Hugh Hewitt radio program (www.hughhewitt.com), "What is a community orgainzer anyway?"
 
An excellent question, indeed, but here's another one?  Who pays a community organizer?  Specifically, exactly who or what paid The Obabmacon while he was busy organzing his community?  Was he on the Cook County payroll?  Was he on the City of Chicago payroll?  I mean, what with his real estate financing through the First National Bank of Rezko and all, The Obamination appears to be nothing more than a typical, Chicago street pol.
 
When I was gorwing up in Chicago we called them "ward healers" and, quite often, much worse.    Today, apparently, they are "community organizers."   (Cue the choir and the golden spot light!)   Either way, it appears that the fabulous Mr. O is just another Mayor Daley hack bought and paid for by the Chicago machine?  
 
The Maelstrom
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

GOV. PALIN SHOULD INVITE MCCAIN TO ANWAR

Alaska Governor Sarah Palin has indicated her support for drilling in Anwar.  She should force the issue by making a very public invitation to John McCain to tour Anwar with her.
 
The accompanying publicity would allow the American electorate to see what a barren and desolate area the proposed drilling site is.  The fallacy of McCain's Grand Canyon/Anwar analogy would be obvious, and McCain would have a sound, factual basis for reversing his previous opposition to drilling.
 
And while we're on the subject of oil drilling, can anybody explain to me why the President didn't unlaterally repeal the executive order barring off shore drilling?   He could have placed the Repblicans in position to claim that the only thing standing in the way of offshore drilling is the dems in Congress!  **Sigh!**
 
MAELSTROM QUOTE OF THE DAY:  "It is scarcely the same thing to put a man on the moon as to put a bone in your nose."  William A. Henry III, "In Defense of Elitism"  (If you haven't read this 1994 classic, you're in for a treat!)
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »