About Me

Name: JTD
Email: THEMAELSTROMBLOG@AOL.COM
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

NO SENATORS FOR PRESIDENT, PLEASE!!!

There ought to be a law, or more properly, there ought to be a Constitutional Amendment.  One sentence, neat and simple. 

 

NO PERSON CURRENTLY SITTING AS A UNITED STATES SENATOR OR WHO HAS SO SERVED WITHIN THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS SHALL BE ELIGIBLE TO HOLD THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

 

Think about it.  What qualities do you want to see in a presidential candidate.  Unless your answer is  "An unchecked ego and an infatuation with the sound of one's own voice", you are not going to find the qualities you are seeking in the Senate.

 

What do Senators do?  They talk (blather endlessly, is more like it) and they hold hearings (at which they beleaguer mere plebes such as you and I with imperious arrogance).  That's it.  That's the job resume.

 

Pick someone, anyone, currently ensconced in the Senate.  Ted "The Splash" Kennedy,   Joe "Plugs" Biden,  Mary "Where am I" Landreau, Babs "The BoxKite" Boxer, Chucky "Where's the camera?: Schumer or even Barrack "PSI" Obama.   What are their qualifications to do ANYTHING, let alone handle the presidency?
 

Would you hire any of these people to work for you?   Would you entrust your family, your business, your portfolio, let alone your country into the care of these people.  Hell, I wouldn't let any one of these clowns feed the goldfish while I'm out of town for a couple of days.

 

Sadly, this includes John McCain.  Look, faced with the whining duet that is "Barry and Michelle" I am firmly, albeit reluctantly, in McCain's camp.  But let's all fess up now,  when the primaries were still ongoing,  we conservatives asked ourselves, "What are John McCain's presidential qualifications, really!!!!!!"    True war hero, yes indeed.  But if that were the sole criterion, Segeant York and Audie Murphy would have occupied 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue post-WWI and WWII.

 

What then?  Commander of the largest naval squadron?   Okay, a little better.....some managerial aspects there.....but c'mon, this is still the man who has so little regard for business that he could scornfully disdain Romney's gold plated business resume in the nasty "private sector" as compared to McCain's lofty "service." Obviously, McCain's squadron leadership experience did not help him comprehend that there is nothing unseemly or unacceptable about the country's largest corporation posting the country's largest quarterly profits.
 
What else?  Well, we know he will defend the country more competently than "Mr. We Are The World!"  Beyond that, what qualification does McCain have.  Why the hyper-inflated senatorial ego, of course!
 
But let's not dwell on Johnny Mac.  This is about senators, per se, and not about individuals.
 
Taken as a group, the United States Senate is, perhaps, the most UNQUALIFIED group of individuals in the country.  Sure, there are the occassional bright lights, but they are few and far between.  And for those rare individuals, the proposed amendment has the five-year preclusion.  A truly deserving potential candidate can restore his presidential elgibility by leaving the Senate and proving his Bona Fides elsewhere, hopefully in the private sector.   The five-year waiting period gives the former senator the chance to show that a real person lies within and has survived the pompous, posturing preening  that is endemic in the so-called upper house. 
 
Think of all the fatuous, empty suits (or skirts) whose candidacies would not have been inflicted upon us had this amendment been enacted:   Hillary, Barrack, John Edwards, Chris Dodd, Joe Biden, to name but a few.
 
Now all we need is a name.  Ah, yes, the NBSA......The No BullS*** Amendment.   Let the petitiions roll!
 
THE MAELSTROM QUOTE OF THE DAY:  "Be the change you wish to see in the world."  Mohandis Ghandi, shamelessly dissing the Messiah by ripping off his gilded prose 60 year before the fact.
 
 
 

 
 

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA VICTORY = ISRAELI STRIKE ON IRAN

Take it from one of those eeeeeevil speculators:  Don't look for a major drop in the price of oil until well after the election.   We may be down about 15% from the recent peaks, but that is well within normal market fluctuations.  I may be small potatoes when it comes to the extent of my speculation in the commodity markets, but I am well attuned to where the big boys are putting their money.
 
Those insiders are convinced that Israel is not going to stand by and let Little Man Ahmandinijad brings his nuclear weapons dream to fruition.  If Obama is elected, the Israelis are guaranteed to act before he takes office on January 20, 2009.    They have no faith in Obama's commitment to protect Israel or prevent Iran from getting nukes. 
 
An Israeli strike, whether with or without United States' support or participation,  is guaranteed to disrupt oil traffic in the Middle East for anywhere from a couple of weeks to several months.  Iran has credibly threatened to shut down the straits of Hormuz if their nuclear facilities are attacked.   Don't doubt that they have the means to do it.
 
Roughly 17 million barrels of oil per day or about 40% of all ocean-carried oil is shipped via tanker through these narrow straits.   All of the oil squeezing through the 21-mile strait is well within range of Iranian missiles and aircraft.   The sinking of only a few tankers would be sufficient to render those waters impassable.
 
If Israel is acting with the support of the United States, you can expect the American Navy to try to keep the straits open, but the Iranian response is likely to be intense.  It is possible that the Iranian response will also include strikes against its neighbors production facilities.  Facing Iran across the gulf and the straits, after all, are Saudia Arabia, the UAE, Qatar and Kuwait.  (We won't even consider here the 40,000-60,000 missiles aimed at Israel by Iranian proxies in Lebanon and Gaza.)
 
World producers, consumers and  -- yes -- speculators are hedging their bets based upon the expectation that a huge oil stockpile crisis is just around the corner. 
 
While an Obama election guarantees Israeli action between November 4, 2008 and January 20, 2009,  a McCain election victory does NOT eliminate the possibility of a strike against Iran, it merely widens the window of opportunity.  The Israelis know that they can count on John McCain to support action against Iran's nukes, and therefore, they will not feel compelled to act by January 20, 2009.
 
Of course, there is also the more remote possibility that Israel is already in possession of information concerning Iran's nuclear progress which makes immediate action necessary.  Whether Israel, under such circumstances, would take the risk of being accused of trying to influence the U.S. elections by acting before November 4th is unknown -- most likely remote, but not impossible.
 
Therefore, the threat of massive disruption of oil supplies is with us today and will be with us AT LEAST until January 20, 2009 if Obama is elected.   The risk remains if McCain is elected, but the action deadline will be extended to that time when Israel -- and perhaps the United States -- determines that Iran's nuclear program is approaching the point of no return and must be stopped then and there.
 
Think about it:  If you were a big money producer or consumer in the oil markets wouldn't YOU be hedging your interests right now?  Only a fool would not!  
 
Oh, and by the way, only a complete idiot (are you listening Miss Pelolsi) would be thinking about drawing on our strategic oil stockpiles now, when a massive market disruption may be only weeks away?
 
THE MAELSTROM QUOTE OF THE DAY"  "Sometimes war is the ONLY answer!"
 
TheMaelstrom
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »