About Me

Name: JTD
Email: THEMAELSTROMBLOG@AOL.COM
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

PLEASE, LET'S DEFINE THE BRADLEY EFFECT CORRECTLY

In his November 1st Town Hall column, "The Spiral of Silence", Wynton Hall improperly defines the Bradley Effect. 
(
http://townhall.com/columnists/WyntonHall/2008/10/31/obamas_spiral_of_silence)
Since we are going to hear endless prattling from the media about the BE after Obama's vote count falls drastically short of his poll numbers and McCain sweeps to victory, it is important that we get this definition correct.
 
Named after  democrat Los Angeles Mayor Thomas Bradley who lost his race for California governor in 1982 (and again in 1986) after leading comfortably in the polls prior to the election, the BE was the result of people's fear of being characterized as "racist" if they indicated to a pollster that they were intending to vote for Bradley's opponent.    Bradley, the minority candidate's, poll numbers were inflated because of the sheer number of undecided or Republican voters who told pollsters they were voting for Bradley rather than risk being judge a racist.
 
Hall erroneously indicates in his column that the Bradley Effect is the result of actual, latent racism.    Again, since the fevered minds of the radical left are going to be screaming "racism" endlessly and vociferously after Obama loses, we simply cannot afford to let the dems define the Bradley Effect.
 
I predict that the BE in 2008 is going to be far greater than it was in 1982.   Today's political climate has been racially hypercharged
by the supposedly post-racial candidate, Obama.  Let's not forget that the left has never been faster on the draw when it comes to pulling the racisim trigger than they are today.   Recall that Hillary's tears after one of the democrat primaries, were called racist by the Obama camp.   Most recently,  a liberal loon opined in his column that the word "socialism"  was a code word for "Black."  Therefore, to call BHO economic policies socialist was racism, pure and simple. 
 
In a campaign where anything and everything can be deemed a "code word" for some other nefarious epithet that must never be uttered in public or private,  the fear of being unfairly deemed a racist is greater than ever.  Undecided in your vote?  Just tell the pollster you're voting Obama, get the clown off the phone and get back to dinner.    Leaning toward McCain?  Uhoh, do you really want to tell that to this cipher with the clipboard.   Just say, "I like Obama" and get on with your shopping.   Can't be too careful, nowadays. 
 
So Obama leads in the polls.  Big deal.  We are going to find out that McCain is ahead in the hearts and minds of the electorate. 
 
Sorry, Barry, old buddy, old pal.......It's not your year.  By the way, 2012 is not going to be your year either, my duplicitous friend.  By then -- even if you haven't been indicted in the Rezko affair -- all of your carefully hidden little secrets will be public domain, and your carefully crafted simulacrum of substance will be the stuff of farce.  You will be nothing more than a bizarre historical footnote!  How Sweet It Is!  
 
THE MAELSTROM QUOTE OF THE DAY:
 
Success usually comes to those who are too busy to spend their time looking for it.
 
Henry David Thoreau 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

AYERS IS NO "WASHED UP OLD TERRORIST"

During his last debate with Obama, John McCain brushed off William Ayers as nothing more than a "washed up old terrorist."
 
Such a cavalier dismissal underestimates the damage that a dedicated marxist continues to wreck from within our ideologically debauched educational system. 
 
In the October 16, 2008 Wall Street Journal, Sol Stern, a Senior Fellow at the Mannhattan Institute, reveals some appalling facts about Mr. Ayers' more recent accomplishments.  Mr. Stern notes, "In the world of the Ed. schools, Mr. Ayers' movement has established a sizeable beachhead.  -- witness his election earlier this year as vice president for curriculum of the American Education Research Association, the nation's largest organization of education professors and researchers."  (An unrepentent terrporist is VP of the AERA?  Wait, it gets better.)
 
Or consider this:  "Mr. Ayers was hired by the Chicago public schools to train teachers......"    Though Ayers calls himself a reformer, Stern saliently notes, "In fact, as one of the leaders of a movement for bringing radical social justice teaching into our public school classrooms, Mr. Ayers is not a school reformer.  He is a school destroyer."
 
Let's not lose sight of the fact that this man is a terrorist.  Arrested in connection with multiple Weather Underground bombings but spared prison time on a technicality in the 1970s, Ayers chortled upon his release from jail, "Guilty as charged.  Free as a bird."
 
This is the same Bill Ayers who, in his fourth trip to the marxist paradise of Hugo Chavez's Venezuela in 2006 said to Chavez, "We share the belief that education is the motor-force of revolution..."  
 
This is the same Bill Ayers who in 2001 stood on an American flag for a cover photo of Chicago Magazine.
 
This is the same Bill Ayers who, in an interview with the New York Times in 2001 said, "I don't regret setting bombs, I feel we didn't do enough." And, when further pressed if he would do it again added, "I don't want to discount the possibility."
 
This is the same Bill Ayers who in 1970 planned the bombing of a dance social at Ft. Dix, New Jersey, with the intent of killing dozens of United States soldiers and their dates.  (This was the bomb that detonated prematurely in a Manhattan townhouse, killing three members of the Weather Underground and sending Ayers and his terrorist wife Bernadine Dohrn into hiding.)
 
Yes, this is the Bill Ayers that Obama worked with on the Annenberg Challenge and with whom he wasted $150,000,000.00 on radical educational programs that a later Annenberg audit determined produced no educational improvements and no successful programs.
 
Yes, this is the same Bill Ayers, that Chicago Mayor, Richard J. Daley, Jr. -- for whom no one on the Left is too radical -- described as having "...done a lot of good in this city and nationally." So America's schools of education, whose students have the lowest SAT's scores of all disciplines in the United States, are also irredeemably marxcist and radical, and at the center of it all stands William Ayers.  Before John McCain or any one of us, for that matter, are tempted to dismiss Ayers as a "washed up old terrorist" remember this:  The vermin of the radical left NEVER stop gnawing away at the foundations of our house. 

In 1970 Ayers, the bomb-trowing terrorist, was dangerous. In 2008 Ayers the the radical, ideolgue school reformer, is
even more dangerous! 

THE MAELSTROM QUOTE OF THE DAY:

Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe.  
                  H.G. Wells 

(Hmmmmmmmmmm, who do you think is winning that race?) 
                 The Maelstrom
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

SECRET BALLOT IS A WINNING ISSUE FOR MCCAIN

Elections often turn on small issues, especially when the pivotal issue is simple, easy to explain and cuts to the heart of core American beliefs.   Obama's assault on the secret ballot is a slam dunk winning issue.  Lord knows, McCain needs a pivotal issue right now.  Why isn't he using the card check bill to bludgeon Obama into submission.

It is time for all of us to force this issue into the spotlight.

The secret ballot is a revered part of our heritage.  Everyone understands it, everyone instinctively and intuitively believes that it is sacrosanct.    Yet Obama, proving his credentials as a Big Labor shill,  backs the card check bill that the unions desparately crave.

The bill -- shamelessly and cynically titled the "Employee Free Choice Act" -- deprives employees of the right to a secret ballot in elections to determine if they will be represented by a union.  Apparently, Obama's idea of "free choice" is to allow employees to be browbeaten by union thugs and goons.

Obama strongly supports this bill, but he doesn't want Americans -- other than Big Labor -- to know that.  So this powerful and potentially pivotal issue has been ignored by the relentlessly pro-Obama media and, consequently, is unknown to the vast majority of the American electorate.   It is time to trumpet this issue.

Fundamentally, this issue is a "two-fer."   Not only does it place Obama squarely against a right that the American public holds dear, it definitely proves his slavish devotion to Big Labor.   It undeniably shows that he would deny Americans a fundamental right rather than stand up to any of the democrat special interest groups.

The charge must be levied loudly and vehemently, "Obama is opposed to the secret ballot."   How can he possible repond?  How can he possibly defend his position?   Will he say, "No, I am only opposed to the secret ballot in union elections."   No one is going to buy that argument.  To the average American it's simple, "Keep your damn hands off the secret ballot.   Union election or not, leave the secret ballot alone!"

This is a fire storm issue.  One that people "get" at the gut level.   Any fair minded person will intuitively and immediately recognize the kind of union thuggery implicit in the bill. 

This issue is a poweful Obamacide.  Time to spray the roaches.

THE MAELSTROM QUOTE OF THE DAY:

"If you don't know context, you don't know anything."  
                                 Dennis Prager.  Talk radio host, author and lecturer.

The Maelstrom



 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

NEWS FLASH: NEW YORK TIMES ENDORSES SARAH PALIN

 
Can you believe it?   I quote directly from the New York Times:
 
"Where is it written that only senators are qualified to become President?.....Where is it written that governors and mayors. . . .are too local, too provincial?. . . Presidential candidates have always chosen their running mates for reasons of practical demography, not idealized democracy. . . .What a splendid system, we say to ourselves, that takes little-known men, tests them in high office and permits them to grow into statesmen...Why shouldn't a little-known woman have the same opportunity to grow?" 
 
Oh wait,  that's the New York Times endorsing Geraldine Ferraro on July 3, 1984.  Hmmmm, sound like the Old Gray Lady has been a tad hypocritical lately, don't it?
 
THE MAELSTROM QUOTE OF THE DAY:
 
"If one wishes to foretell the future of a society, one should visit its public school classrooms to see what is happening now.
William A. Henry III, "In Defense of Elitism" DoubleDay 1994
 
If that doesn't scare the hell out of you, then I don't know what will.
                                                                              The Maelstrom
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

WHO PAYS A COMMUNITY ORGANIZER ANYWAY?

Mark Steyn (www.steynonline.com) has repeatedly asked on the Hugh Hewitt radio program (www.hughhewitt.com), "What is a community orgainzer anyway?"
 
An excellent question, indeed, but here's another one?  Who pays a community organizer?  Specifically, exactly who or what paid The Obabmacon while he was busy organzing his community?  Was he on the Cook County payroll?  Was he on the City of Chicago payroll?  I mean, what with his real estate financing through the First National Bank of Rezko and all, The Obamination appears to be nothing more than a typical, Chicago street pol.
 
When I was gorwing up in Chicago we called them "ward healers" and, quite often, much worse.    Today, apparently, they are "community organizers."   (Cue the choir and the golden spot light!)   Either way, it appears that the fabulous Mr. O is just another Mayor Daley hack bought and paid for by the Chicago machine?  
 
The Maelstrom
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »