About Me

Name: JTD
Email: THEMAELSTROMBLOG@AOL.COM
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

PLEASE, LET'S DEFINE THE BRADLEY EFFECT CORRECTLY

In his November 1st Town Hall column, "The Spiral of Silence", Wynton Hall improperly defines the Bradley Effect. 
(
http://townhall.com/columnists/WyntonHall/2008/10/31/obamas_spiral_of_silence)
Since we are going to hear endless prattling from the media about the BE after Obama's vote count falls drastically short of his poll numbers and McCain sweeps to victory, it is important that we get this definition correct.
 
Named after  democrat Los Angeles Mayor Thomas Bradley who lost his race for California governor in 1982 (and again in 1986) after leading comfortably in the polls prior to the election, the BE was the result of people's fear of being characterized as "racist" if they indicated to a pollster that they were intending to vote for Bradley's opponent.    Bradley, the minority candidate's, poll numbers were inflated because of the sheer number of undecided or Republican voters who told pollsters they were voting for Bradley rather than risk being judge a racist.
 
Hall erroneously indicates in his column that the Bradley Effect is the result of actual, latent racism.    Again, since the fevered minds of the radical left are going to be screaming "racism" endlessly and vociferously after Obama loses, we simply cannot afford to let the dems define the Bradley Effect.
 
I predict that the BE in 2008 is going to be far greater than it was in 1982.   Today's political climate has been racially hypercharged
by the supposedly post-racial candidate, Obama.  Let's not forget that the left has never been faster on the draw when it comes to pulling the racisim trigger than they are today.   Recall that Hillary's tears after one of the democrat primaries, were called racist by the Obama camp.   Most recently,  a liberal loon opined in his column that the word "socialism"  was a code word for "Black."  Therefore, to call BHO economic policies socialist was racism, pure and simple. 
 
In a campaign where anything and everything can be deemed a "code word" for some other nefarious epithet that must never be uttered in public or private,  the fear of being unfairly deemed a racist is greater than ever.  Undecided in your vote?  Just tell the pollster you're voting Obama, get the clown off the phone and get back to dinner.    Leaning toward McCain?  Uhoh, do you really want to tell that to this cipher with the clipboard.   Just say, "I like Obama" and get on with your shopping.   Can't be too careful, nowadays. 
 
So Obama leads in the polls.  Big deal.  We are going to find out that McCain is ahead in the hearts and minds of the electorate. 
 
Sorry, Barry, old buddy, old pal.......It's not your year.  By the way, 2012 is not going to be your year either, my duplicitous friend.  By then -- even if you haven't been indicted in the Rezko affair -- all of your carefully hidden little secrets will be public domain, and your carefully crafted simulacrum of substance will be the stuff of farce.  You will be nothing more than a bizarre historical footnote!  How Sweet It Is!  
 
THE MAELSTROM QUOTE OF THE DAY:
 
Success usually comes to those who are too busy to spend their time looking for it.
 
Henry David Thoreau 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

AYERS IS NO "WASHED UP OLD TERRORIST"

During his last debate with Obama, John McCain brushed off William Ayers as nothing more than a "washed up old terrorist."
 
Such a cavalier dismissal underestimates the damage that a dedicated marxist continues to wreck from within our ideologically debauched educational system. 
 
In the October 16, 2008 Wall Street Journal, Sol Stern, a Senior Fellow at the Mannhattan Institute, reveals some appalling facts about Mr. Ayers' more recent accomplishments.  Mr. Stern notes, "In the world of the Ed. schools, Mr. Ayers' movement has established a sizeable beachhead.  -- witness his election earlier this year as vice president for curriculum of the American Education Research Association, the nation's largest organization of education professors and researchers."  (An unrepentent terrporist is VP of the AERA?  Wait, it gets better.)
 
Or consider this:  "Mr. Ayers was hired by the Chicago public schools to train teachers......"    Though Ayers calls himself a reformer, Stern saliently notes, "In fact, as one of the leaders of a movement for bringing radical social justice teaching into our public school classrooms, Mr. Ayers is not a school reformer.  He is a school destroyer."
 
Let's not lose sight of the fact that this man is a terrorist.  Arrested in connection with multiple Weather Underground bombings but spared prison time on a technicality in the 1970s, Ayers chortled upon his release from jail, "Guilty as charged.  Free as a bird."
 
This is the same Bill Ayers who, in his fourth trip to the marxist paradise of Hugo Chavez's Venezuela in 2006 said to Chavez, "We share the belief that education is the motor-force of revolution..."  
 
This is the same Bill Ayers who in 2001 stood on an American flag for a cover photo of Chicago Magazine.
 
This is the same Bill Ayers who, in an interview with the New York Times in 2001 said, "I don't regret setting bombs, I feel we didn't do enough." And, when further pressed if he would do it again added, "I don't want to discount the possibility."
 
This is the same Bill Ayers who in 1970 planned the bombing of a dance social at Ft. Dix, New Jersey, with the intent of killing dozens of United States soldiers and their dates.  (This was the bomb that detonated prematurely in a Manhattan townhouse, killing three members of the Weather Underground and sending Ayers and his terrorist wife Bernadine Dohrn into hiding.)
 
Yes, this is the Bill Ayers that Obama worked with on the Annenberg Challenge and with whom he wasted $150,000,000.00 on radical educational programs that a later Annenberg audit determined produced no educational improvements and no successful programs.
 
Yes, this is the same Bill Ayers, that Chicago Mayor, Richard J. Daley, Jr. -- for whom no one on the Left is too radical -- described as having "...done a lot of good in this city and nationally." So America's schools of education, whose students have the lowest SAT's scores of all disciplines in the United States, are also irredeemably marxcist and radical, and at the center of it all stands William Ayers.  Before John McCain or any one of us, for that matter, are tempted to dismiss Ayers as a "washed up old terrorist" remember this:  The vermin of the radical left NEVER stop gnawing away at the foundations of our house. 

In 1970 Ayers, the bomb-trowing terrorist, was dangerous. In 2008 Ayers the the radical, ideolgue school reformer, is
even more dangerous! 

THE MAELSTROM QUOTE OF THE DAY:

Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe.  
                  H.G. Wells 

(Hmmmmmmmmmm, who do you think is winning that race?) 
                 The Maelstrom
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BARACK THE BARBARIAN

Of course Barack is a radical on most issues.  But on one particular issue he is more than radical, he is a barbarian.  That issue is abortion.
 
Why?   Because of his support for partial birth abortion, and even worse, his belief that a baby that survives an abortion attempt must be deprived of medical care and left to die in ignominious solitude.   PBA is bad enough.   How can any person or society that claims a modicum of civilization countenance a procedure that pierces the skull of a perfectly formed, healthy, beautiful and viable infant
and sucks out its brains?
 
How can anyone -- especially that sophisticated, urbane, Haaaaaaavard trained, metrosexual named barack -- be so radically devoted to the concept of abortion that he would deny medical care to an infant that survives a botched abortion?   This is savagery, pure and simple; and anyone that supports it, is himself a barbarian of the first order. 
 
Before proceeding any further, let me define myself.  I am agnostic, so I bring no religious argument to this debate.  I am very conservative, usually vote Republican, but am decidedly moderate on the issue of abortion.  I believe that it would be imprudent to outlaw abortion, but that it is necessary to strictly control it.   I believe, for example, that no minor should have an abortion without the consent of her parents.  I believe that partial birth abortion is both inhuman and inhumane.  I believe that a fetus upon attaining viability is confered with its own Human rights.
 
Conceptually, abortion is nasty and ugly.....particularly nasty and ugly when routinely utilized as a woman's primary birth control device. And let's not pull any punches here, the farther along in development the fetus is, the nastier and uglier the procedure gets.   Even if necessary to protect the life of the mother,  it is ghastly business.
 
I do not, however,  believe that Human life exists at the moment of conception.   Is it life?  Yes, of course it is!   Is it Human.  Well, It is certainly of Human origin!     But, perhaps there's a better question to ask:  Is the fetus at the point of conception a Human Being?  No, it is not.  And it is not, for the same reason that we allow doctors or family to "pull the plug" when a patient is brain dead:  The absence of discernible, coherent brain activity.
 
Like the brain dead patient, the fetus is a living organism, but it is not what we recongnize as a Human Being.   It is on the way to becoming a Human Being, God willing, but it is not yet there.
 
Ignoring -- only for sake of this argument -- the lack of a constitutional basis for Roe v. Wade, the original trimester formula for discerning the presence of life has a logical basis, although it must be acknowledged that subsequent court cases have essentially gutted Roe's trimester formulation.   Nonetheless there is a strong rational behind the formula:  In the first three months, the fetus is nascient life only, and the mother's rights must prevail.  In the last three months, the fetus is -- especially given modern medical capacities -- capable of life outside the mother's womb and MUST be accorded its own rights vis-avis the mother.
 
And that leaves the middle trimester. Ay, there's the rub!    Who's rights prevail here?  The mother or the  fetus?  Obviously this is the most difficult of grey areas,  especially in light of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's observation that the trimester formula was on a collision course with itself, as advances in obstetric medicine inevitably pushed the point of viability ever closer to the moment of conception.
 
But for our purposes here,  we need not address the issue of viability.  Can any rational person doubt that a full term, viable infant is a Human Being, even if its head -- and only its head -- is still inside the mother's birth canal?   Of course not, only a hopeless ideologue could so argue.  Only an individual who has cast aside his own humanity could so argue.  Only a barbarian!
 
That's bad enough, but consider the cruelty and savagery of the man who says we must not give medical care to a surviving infant, because to do so might hinder the cause of abortion itself.  Where is that man's compassion?  Where is his humanity?  There is none, for that man is a barbarian.
 
And this brings us to the essence of Barack Hussein Obama.......a man so blindly devoted to his radical ideologies that he is willing, when necessary, to check his humanity at the door and to wreck unspeakable cruelty upon the innocent.
 
Beyond the well tailored suits, beyond the florid rhetoric, beyond the winning smile there lies a monster, a savage.......a barbarian!
 
                                                                                                                                                               The Maelstrom
 
THE MAELSTROM QUOTE OF THE DAY:
 
The politician who is willing to tax Peter to pay Paul, can always count on the vote of Paul.
 
                                                                                                         H.L. Mencken
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

SECRET BALLOT IS A WINNING ISSUE FOR MCCAIN

Elections often turn on small issues, especially when the pivotal issue is simple, easy to explain and cuts to the heart of core American beliefs.   Obama's assault on the secret ballot is a slam dunk winning issue.  Lord knows, McCain needs a pivotal issue right now.  Why isn't he using the card check bill to bludgeon Obama into submission.

It is time for all of us to force this issue into the spotlight.

The secret ballot is a revered part of our heritage.  Everyone understands it, everyone instinctively and intuitively believes that it is sacrosanct.    Yet Obama, proving his credentials as a Big Labor shill,  backs the card check bill that the unions desparately crave.

The bill -- shamelessly and cynically titled the "Employee Free Choice Act" -- deprives employees of the right to a secret ballot in elections to determine if they will be represented by a union.  Apparently, Obama's idea of "free choice" is to allow employees to be browbeaten by union thugs and goons.

Obama strongly supports this bill, but he doesn't want Americans -- other than Big Labor -- to know that.  So this powerful and potentially pivotal issue has been ignored by the relentlessly pro-Obama media and, consequently, is unknown to the vast majority of the American electorate.   It is time to trumpet this issue.

Fundamentally, this issue is a "two-fer."   Not only does it place Obama squarely against a right that the American public holds dear, it definitely proves his slavish devotion to Big Labor.   It undeniably shows that he would deny Americans a fundamental right rather than stand up to any of the democrat special interest groups.

The charge must be levied loudly and vehemently, "Obama is opposed to the secret ballot."   How can he possible repond?  How can he possibly defend his position?   Will he say, "No, I am only opposed to the secret ballot in union elections."   No one is going to buy that argument.  To the average American it's simple, "Keep your damn hands off the secret ballot.   Union election or not, leave the secret ballot alone!"

This is a fire storm issue.  One that people "get" at the gut level.   Any fair minded person will intuitively and immediately recognize the kind of union thuggery implicit in the bill. 

This issue is a poweful Obamacide.  Time to spray the roaches.

THE MAELSTROM QUOTE OF THE DAY:

"If you don't know context, you don't know anything."  
                                 Dennis Prager.  Talk radio host, author and lecturer.

The Maelstrom



 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

HAS BARRY'S SOLDIER SNUB BEEN VERIFIED?

Following is a post from Townhall.com today.  It is purportedly a statement from an American soldier in Afghanistan describing the Obamarama's snubbing of the troops.  DOES ANYONE KNOW IF THIS CAN BE CORROBORATED?
 
themaelstrom.blogtownhall.com
______________________
 
Subject: Won't see this on ABC
or as they're now known - All Barack Channel

This is a note from a warrior in Afganistan about Obambi's recent "tour of doody." Apparently the snubbing of the wounded soldiers in Germany was no fluke.

Hello everyone,
As you know I am not a very political person. I just wanted to pass along that Senator Obama came to Bagram Afghanistan for about an hour on his visit to 'The War Zone'. I wanted to share with you what happened.
He got off the plane and got into a bullet proof vehicle, got to the area to meet with the Major General (2 Star) who is the commander here at Bagram.

As the Soldiers where lined up to shake his hand he blew them off and didn't say a word as he went into the conference room to meet the General. As he finished, the vehicles took him to the ClamShell (pretty much a big top tent that military personnel can play basketball or work out in with weights) so he could take his publicity pictures playing basketball. He again shunned the opportunity to talk to Soldiers to thank them for their service.

So really he was just here to make a showing for the American's back home that he is their candidate for President. I think that if you are going to make an effort to come all the way over here you would thank those that are providing the freedom that they are providing for you.

I swear we got more thanks from the NBA Basketball Players or the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders than from one of the Senators, who wants to be the President of the United States. I just don't understand how anyone would want him to be our Commander-and-Chief. It was almost that he was scared to be around those that provide the freedom for him and our great country.

If this is blunt and to the point I am sorry but I wanted you all to know
what kind of caliber of person he really is. What you see in the news is all fake.

In service,
CPT Jeffrey S. Porter
Battle Captain
TF Wasatch

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »